Every dated claim from the tape, logged and stamped. This page updates when reality does. Screenshot us — we don't edit history.
Read it against what's already pinned on this board, and the roadmap quietly confirms three of our own findings:
VERBATIM FROM THE PEARL COMMUNITY DISCORD, PUBLIC CHANNEL. THE READ-ACROSS IS OURS.
Chatter picked up in the Pearl community channels — rumor and argument, not fact, but exactly the raw material a case gets built from. Quotes are word-for-word from the Discord; only the identities are redacted.
Members spotted Pearl featured in a Google Cloud (GCP) banner. The prevailing read in the channel: it's the standard GCP startup-program tie — "partners like many other startups" — not a signed serving deal.
Odds it's a major GCP deal: low. But it's a fresh pin on the board.
The doubters' cut: nobody outside Together AI is racing to serve Pearl-ified open models. If a 2-for-1 Gemma were meaningfully better, the argument goes, rival platforms would be scrambling for it — and so far they're not.
The bull reply: that gap is exactly what a mining subsidy exists to close — which is why the next hyperscaler signature matters so much.
The recurring wish in the channels: the next hot open model — GLM 5.2 and friends — Pearl-ified and served somewhere beyond a single Gemma build on Together AI.
Fireworks is the name that keeps coming up. Reinforces the top hyperscaler suspect.